Most OKR tools ask how far along you are.
We ask whether you still believe.

Anonymous confidence votes, qualitative reasoning, and a sparkline that refuses to average disagreement away.

Start free See the method →
Q1 2026 · Onboarding
4 votes · 2h ago
Reduce time-to-first-checkin to under 5 min
Currently 7 min · target 5 min
Why we exist

Most OKR tools assume your team is already aligned. We don't.

Existing tools track how far along you are — a progress question. Conlineo tracks whether you still believe you'll get there — a risk and alignment question. Confidence drops weeks before delivery slips. We give your team a way to see that, talk about it, and course-correct before the metrics catch up.

01 — The vote

Anonymous 1–5, before anyone sees a number

Each teammate scores a key result from 1 (no chance) to 5 (already done) without seeing how anyone else voted. Social conformity is the enemy of an honest signal — so we cut it out at the source.

02 — The reasoning

Positives and concerns, side by side

Every vote can carry two short notes — one reason for confidence, one reason for concern. The team sees both columns with equal weight. The optimist and the worrier each get a microphone.

03 — The sparkline

One line per person, ten check-ins back

Confidence over time, plotted per-teammate in their own colour. We never average. Convergence means the room is aligning. Divergence means there's a conversation to have.

04 — The check-in

Real-time, on demand, never scheduled

When someone opens a check-in, everyone in the workspace is pulled in via WebSockets — it feels like a live moment, not a form. Stack them as densely or as loosely as your team needs. No fixed cadence.

What we value

Three things we will keep choosing — even when it costs us.

Every company says they value curiosity, tension, and clarity. Most don't test those values against revenue. We try to. The third one is the one we don't see anywhere else, and it's the one we believe in most.

01
Curiosity

A red key result is more useful than a green one.

Green is the end of a conversation; amber and red are the start of one. We design for the moment a teammate notices a confidence line dropping and asks "why is that?" — because the most valuable thing on this site is a team that gets curious about its own disagreement before delivery proves them right.

In practice
  • Every teammate's individual confidence line is hover-able. Names attached, no anonymous averages.
  • Concerns appear with the same prominence as positives — never collapsed behind a "show more".
  • The default vote is 3 (Moderate), not 5. Optimism is a choice, not a setting.
02
Tension

Disagreement is the feature, not the bug.

When three teammates score a key result at 4 and one scores it at 2, the gap is the most interesting thing on the page. Most tools average it away. We plot it, name it, and ask the room to talk about it. A team that can hold a disagreement out loud is a team that ships.

In practice
  • Per-person sparklines preserve the spread. We never collapse to a single trend line.
  • Free-text comments are attributed by name — the optimist and the worrier both get the floor.
  • When team confidence drops below threshold, we surface it. We don't soften the language.
03
Clarity

We say what we see. Even when it's uncomfortable.

Conlineo will never roll a struggling key result into a happy summary card. When a sparkline diverges, the tool says so plainly — and we hold ourselves to the same standard. The roadmap is public. The pricing is on the page. No "contact sales". No smoothed-over summaries. Clarity is what makes the hard conversation possible.

In practice
  • No "executive summary" view that smooths divergence into a single colour.
  • Public changelog, public roadmap, public SLA. You know what we're building and why.
  • You own your data. Export to CSV or JSON, any time, no API key required.